Original Article: JRCRS. 2024; 12(2): 80-84.
4- Effects of Neural Mobilization with and without Cervical Lateral Glide on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Patients with Cervical Radiculopathy
Sobia Nawaz1, Dr. Filza Shaukat2, Dr. Mariam Liaquat3, Dr. Ramesha Tahir4, Akash Ahmad5, Maria Shahzad6
1Senior Physiotherapist at Allied Hospital, Faisalabad, Pakistan
2Assistant Professor at The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan
3Senior Lecturer at The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan
4Physiotherapist at Shifa Home Healthcare Dubai, UAE
5Student at The University of Lahore, Lahore, Paksitan
6Student at Riphah International University, Lahore, Pakistan
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND:
Cervical radiculopathy is the entrapment of the cervical nerves results in a clinical condition. Numerous clinical indications, such as discomfort, sensory deficits, motor deficits, reduced reflexes, and any of the combinations might be caused by cervical radiculopathy.
OBJECTIVE:
To determine the effects of neural mobilization with and without cervical lateral glide of pain, range of motion and functional disability in patients with cervical radiculopathy
METHODOLOGY:
9 Months duration of randomized clinical trial study done in Physiotherapy Department OPD of Allied Hospital, Faisalabad. 86 cervical radiculopathy patients divided into two equal groups using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale pain score as the outcome measure. The SPSS program version 25 was used for data administration and analysis. Convenient sampling technique was used. Both genders of age of 25 to 45 were included. Tumors, fractures, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoporosis, and extended steroid use were excluded. The routine physical therapy, neural mobilization along with cervical lateral gliding administered to Group A subjects. Group B received neural mobilization with routine physical therapy. Data was collected on the baseline, 2nd week and then at 4th weeks. Numeric pain rating and neck disability index, Goniometer was used for assessment.
RESULT:
Both genders of age of 25 to 45 for between group analysis independent sample t-test used which shows there was a significant difference in before and after intervention as p-values of all outcome measures were less than 0.05 in post-intervention. Repeated measure ANOVA was used for within group comparison which shows both groups show effectiveness but group A shows more significant results as their mean differences is more than group B.
CONCLUSION:
It is concluded that both techniques are effective but incorporating cervical lateral glides into neural mobilization has yielded more significant results in this study.
KEY WORDS:
Cervical radiculopathy, pain, range of motion and functional disability, neural mobilization.